Is my WIFE Good, and Does it Matter?

My wife pisses me off. She has made me feel stupid hundreds of times. She has this strange ability to make me cry those uber-pathetic hiccup sobs that just make me look like an idiot.

And she brings me joy. I adore her. She makes me smile and laugh more than anyone else. She loves me, expresses her affection effusively, and helps me engage in activities that make me feel alive. In fact, she brings me more joy than arguably all my other relationships combined.

Alicia, Spring of 2013, Washington DC

Alicia, Spring of 2013, Washington DC

Why am I talking about this?

In my last post, “Is the World Good, and Does it Matter?” I mentioned my opinion that the world is, in fact, good, and believing so can potentially lead to a better life. Since then, a number of blog readers, such as Eddie the Erudite, have written me with questions like, “what about sin?” and “what about suffering in the world?” and, my favorite, “what about immense suckiness?” Good questions!

Eddie, “The world is good” is one example of a type of judgement I call a “universal assessment” (UA), which are overall judgements we make about the universe. Example? My friend Dan Black is writing a dissertation on 19th century Hungarian composer Franz Liszt. Two days ago he told me about an assertion made by a music critic in 1987 while comparing Liszt to Wagner. “For Liszt,” the critic said, “the ‘reality’ is the divine vision; for Wagner the ‘reality’ is a cruel world.” (P. Merrick) This difference in their assessment of the world played out in the emotional valence of their musical compositions.

Before Franz Liszt died in 1886, he was a pianist, composer, and famous teacher —of Wagner and others—and a Franciscan.

Before Franz Liszt died in 1886, he was a pianist, composer, and famous teacher —of Wagner and others—and a Franciscan.

My idea is simple: our universal assessments like “the world is cruel” matter in a variety ways—even musical expression. In order to answer Eddie’s question, however, I must dive a little deeper into what UAs are exactly.

Until his final years, Wagner's life was characterised by political exile, turbulent love affairs, poverty and repeated flight from his creditors.

Until his final years, Wagner’s life was characterised by political exile, turbulent love affairs, poverty and repeated flight from his creditors.

Universal assessments are not simply any belief one has about the universe. A few nights ago, I got out my logic textbook from college (logic class is sexy), and remembered that one can mean at least three different things when making a statement like the “the world is good.”

Option 1: I might be saying that the entire universe is characterized by goodness (and thus nothing is bad). This is the potential meaning Eddie the Erudite found concerning. The assertion can be represented by the category statement, “All X is Y.” In fact, since we are talking about the universe, the class of “X” consists of everything that exists—you, me, the box fan that is keeping me cool as I type this, and everything else. Thus we can simplify the category statement to “All is Y” or “All is good.”

Option 2: The second meaning of “the world is good” might be that there is some unknown measure of goodness in the world. This can be represented by the category statement, “Some is Y.” This means nearly nothing. In logic, “some” can mean hardly anything or almost everything.

Option 3: If one asserts “the universe is good” they might mean something like, “Most is Y.” This is closer.

When I say, “the world is good” I want to assert that the world’s moral valence, its gist, its core, its essence, its balance, its je ne sais quoi, is good. In doing so, we have to weigh all the world’s shittiness…

  • 1.6 billion people lack a safe and healthy place to sleep at night (Habitat for Humanity Intl).
  • 870 million people in the world do not get enough food to eat.
  • The 2009 USA Reinvestment Act spent 831 billion dollars by printing money and taking out loans.
  • The West Wing has been off the air for 7 years!

…against all the world’s awesomeness.

  • 5.5 billion people slept last night in a safe and healthy place (see Jer’s crazy math skills).
  • 6.2 billion people get plenty of food to eat (see Jer’s crazy math skills).
  • For every dollar spent in the 2009 Reinvestment Act, there are nearly 100,000 trees. Seriously, according to NASA there are about 400 billion adult trees in the world. At about 200,000 leaves per tree, that is 80 thousand quadrillion leaves (real word—I looked it up—it goes billion, trillion, then quadrillion). I love leaves. They are beautiful. Each one would be mounted in places of honor if they weren’t so damn abundant.
  • I have all seven seasons of The West Wing on my computer!

These stats barely scratch the surface of what is relevant to a universal assessment, but it’s clear enough that there is vast goodness and badness in the universe. Thus asserting the existence of some goodness or some badness (option 2) in the universe is boring because it’s obviously true, and asserting that existence is 100% good or 100% bad (option 1) is boring because it’s obviously false. The interesting question instead is which side wins (option 3). What side is bigger, more weighty, or more numerous?

our earth from the moon

our earth from the moon

Sidestepping the metaphors of size, kilograms, or quantity, at the heart of a universal assessment is some sort of balance point. There is a threshold which must be achieved before a given aspect of an object becomes characteristic of that object. In forming UAs, therefore, we treat existence as a single thing and assess its defining qualities.

So, in response to Eddie the Erudite: yes, sin, suffering and ugliness are huge. But just because they are huge, does not mean they are defining. Of course it is difficult to assess a data set that is so… large.

But we do it. We do it all the time. And it matters.

I met my wife 10 years ago the very first day of college. We were close for a year and a half, dated for three and a half years, and have now been married for almost five years! This decade has created a vast army of pros — the gross tonnage of awesomeness that I see in Alicia — and a monster force of opposing cons — all the shit-tastic things she does that piss me off. In other words, my wife is a large data set. Some is good, some is bad, but what is more defining? Is my wife good? Is she worthwhile? Do I like her?

The Honeymoon Shot: Jer and Alicia, 2008, Tobermory, Canada

The Honeymoon Shot: Jer and Alicia, 2008, Tobermory, Canada

Yes. I do. Thank God! The good radically outweighs the bad. In fact, the good outweighs the bad to such an enormous extent, that I am not afraid that the bad might outweigh the good any time soon. My wife is good. Whew!

And it matters. I have no data to support this, except a violently strong feeling in my gut that reaches from my jaw to my tailbone: my “wife assessment” has an enormous effect on my relationship to her. If I imagine, even for a second, a world in which I thought my wife was an ass, I quickly see relationship dynamics slipping into aggression, resignation, and divorce.

And just kidding! Psychologists actually do have data, lots of it, to support the notion that overall beliefs about one’s significant other affects one’s relationship. In one study, thinking your partner was “perfect” correlated with relationship health and longevity (Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E. M., 2002). In another study (Showers, C. J., & Limke, A, 2006), researchers found that beliefs about a partner are related to breaking-up. And lots of work indicates that one’s overall disposition towards something affects one’s interactions with it — we make “school assessments,” “church assessments,” “friend assessments,” “job assessments,” etc., and they matter.

But I am especially excited about the comparison of “spouse assessments” for understanding UAs because: 1) Spouses are crazy personal. 2) They create an unfathomably large data set. 3) One has no idea how to “count” good and bad aspects. 4) Yet we make overall assessments of spouses all the time because we know its absolutely necessary for the health of our relationship. My own “spouse assessment,” my gut feeling about whether Alicia is in fact good or not, affects my life, and ultimately whether or not I choose to stay married. Likewise, perhaps my universal assessment affects my life, whether or not I choose to stay alive in it, and even add life to it.

There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. — Albert Camus The Myth of Sisyphus

While our own existence is thrust upon us without our consent, we can choose whether or not to pass this existence on to our possible offspring. Presumably, this choice will reflect our judgment as to the worthwhileness of existence.  — James Pawelski (my friend, professor, & thesis advisor)

Beyond suicide and procreation, perhaps my UAs also affect how I get busy living.  Will I suffer through life like a depressed spouse in an abusive relationship (world), or is there another option? Can I be head over heels in love with the universe and thankful for this gift of life? (I got chills when I wrote this.)  Is it possible to be passionately, meaningfully, and levelheadedly in love with life like I am, or try to be, with my wife? I am not sure.

We’ll see…

IMG_3872

Advertisements

About Jer Clifton

Look up, friend. The world is too beautiful for my eyes alone. View all posts by Jer Clifton

10 responses to “Is my WIFE Good, and Does it Matter?

  • abigail.mosebrook@gmail.com

    Really good thoughts Jer! Thanks for sharing!

  • Dan Holcomb

    This prompts two thoughts:

    I used to struggle very deeply with depression. Eventually God led me to this decision: is life worth it, or not? This is a very important universal assessment, and I decided that it was. The long road out of depression started at that crossroads. It was still a dark nasty long journey, but that is the day I started walking out of the darkness.

    Likewise, the journey of faith is a constant re-training of our universal assessment of God: how much does He love us? What is he capable and willing and even excited to do to and for us? Is the life with God a burden and a sacrifice, or a great joy and thrilling opportunity?

    There are always new opportunities to be skeptical and small minded about God’s love for us, or to swallow fear and comfort and approach a situation as if, with Christ, there is great victory to be had, and wonderful realities to experience.

    To see a little bit more of the glory of God, to revel and become alive in its working, a little bit more every chance we get.

    Our ideas about life become our lives. Thank God that Christ does that renewing of the mind thing.

    • Jer Clifton

      Dan, thanks for sharing. I have struggled with depression as well. I think the story you describe is not atypical, and really, quite beautiful in important ways. “Our ideas about life become our lives” — well said.

      I think you are describing a concept I call “homeland tourism.” Where we are amazed walking down the sidewalk to our house to such an extent that people think we must be from out of town. Homeland tourists are my heroes!

      This was a special and meaningful comment Dan. Thank you sharing that part of your self. I am glad you found the universal assessment idea useful.

  • Brandon Allen

    This is wonderful. I feel blessed that I have personally shared a few conversations with you in person regarding these ideas. Its truly wonderful to see you in your element doing what inspires you. Now to comment on the above. I agree that the world is good, and God is good, and he created everything. From a young age I have always had this super boldness, and in prayer and meditation I realized that its love. To be more specific the love that God has placed in my heart for everyone. This was a tough balancing act and it took me a long time learn to use this boldness, strong desire to protect those around, and show kindness in a healthy way. In conclusion, growing from boy to man wasn’t such a hard thing when I realized that God is good, people are good, and that I being a part of God’s creation am good!!

    • Jer Clifton

      Brandon! Thanks for the comment. I am glad this resonates with you like it does with me. I see that boldness in you for sure!

      Your comment also made me think this thought: one of the ideas I am toying around with is that, in addition to the “meta” universal assessment “the world is good,” I think we have assessments that do not describe the universe as a whole, but do describe important aspects of what matters in our universal assessment. Specifically, I think three beliefs build up to our UAs. Namely, what we think of our own lives in general, what we think of people in general, what we think of the natural world and the physical universe in general. What do you think?

  • cac

    Good post, Jer. You bring out a lot of good points. I think there is another dimension involved with this, and it is the issue of direction: where is this universe headed? Premillenialists get a lot of flack because they portray the world is awful and getting worse with the culmination being the tribulation. But the fact is that a proper premill knows the world system gets worse, but the world itself is still a wonderful creation of God. Moreover, there is the fact that altho the tribulation is 7 years long, the millenium, and eternity after that completely overwhelms whatever suckiness we experience now and will experience. In other words, an evangelical outlook is one of goodness and joy because of where the universe is heading, the One who is heading it in that direction, and the fact that we get to participate in what That One is doing to get it there. The issue of hope, therefore, is huge. And it has the wonderful attribute of being comprehensive–the person living in suburbia shares this hope with the refugee in Darfur, and in fact, the person in Darfur has more potential to embrace and own those promises than the suburban jaded heart.   dad

    ________________________________

    • Jer Clifton

      I think you are right on. I recently identified a list of 12 UAs, and one is an attempt to get at exactly what you are talking about. Is the world getting better or getting worse? It’s a question about the basic story of the universe. Where are we headed? Of course, those with a more complex view of the story, like those who believe the world is getting worse but the endpoint is bright, might not fit. In the future I may split this UA into two parts: the end will be bad/good and the world is getting bad/good. Thoughts? I am not sure they are distinct enough for a general audience.

  • Jer’s Thesis in Three Pages Using Non-Academic Language because Academic Language is for Silly Nits | Jer's Intellectual Adventures

    […] of assessments.”  Universal Meta-Assessments were what I was talking about in my last post: Is my wife good, and does it matter?  There are at least four UMAs: 1) Is the world good?  2) Is the world worth existing?  3) Do I […]

  • Once upon a time there was a universe… | Jer's Intellectual Adventures

    […] first was “the world is bad vs. the world is good” that I talk about in the post “Is my WIFE good, and does it matter?” […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: